< All Topics

How does a DGR in Labrador compare to the Onkalo DGR in Finland?

Both the proposed DGR in Labrador and the Onkalo DGR in Finland share the primary objective of providing a secure, long-term solution for managing used nuclear fuel. However, there are some key differences and enhancements that make each project unique, tailoring them to their specific geographic, social, and regulatory contexts. Here’s how they compare:

Key Similarities:

  1. Safety-First Approach: Both projects prioritize the safety of human health and the environment. They are designed to meet or exceed international safety standards.
  2. Multi-Barrier System: Both DGRs employ a multi-barrier approach, utilizing both engineered and natural barriers to securely contain and isolate the used nuclear fuel.
  3. Deep Geological Storage: In both cases, the repositories are situated several hundred meters below the Earth’s surface, in stable geological formations that have been thoroughly studied for their long-term stability.
  4. Regulatory Oversight: Both projects are subject to stringent regulatory frameworks that require comprehensive safety assessments, regular monitoring, and periodic reporting.

Key Differences:

  1. Research & Development: Unlike Onkalo, which is primarily designed for storage, the Labrador DGR also serves as a cutting-edge research facility. This creates opportunities for ongoing study and potential reutilization of used nuclear fuel, increasing its future value.
  2. Community Engagement: While both projects emphasize transparency and stakeholder engagement, the Labrador DGR aims for a uniquely collaborative approach with local and Indigenous communities to address specific local concerns and incorporate traditional knowledge.
  3. Geological Formation: The geological settings might differ between Labrador and Finland, necessitating unique engineering solutions tailored to the specific rock types, groundwater conditions, and other environmental factors.
  4. Climatic Conditions: Labrador and Finland have different climatic conditions, which are taken into account in the design and operation of the respective DGRs to ensure optimal safety and performance.
  5. Ongoing Management: Unlike Onkalo, which plans to eventually seal its repository, the Labrador DGR is designed for ongoing management and monitoring, aligning with the long-term strategy of resource management and R&D.

By understanding both the similarities and differences between the DGR in Labrador and the Onkalo DGR in Finland, one can appreciate how each project is tailored to meet its unique set of requirements while adhering to internationally recognized safety standards.